Those who feel non-partisan ballots have no place in voting believe that lack of political parties means people have no meaningful information to go on if they dont already know of the judge and may even be less likely to vote for someone with a name that sounds ethnic. Veterans Pension Benefits (Aid & Attendance). Tort reform does not involve a single law, torts are legal wrongs that violate the rights of another and lead to a form of civil responsibility. Shes been a judge for 26 years, and shes had to run for office several times. WebOnly six states, including Texas, elect justices in a partisan race. Judges are reelected to additional terms. A cynic might observe that Abbott's ardent interest coincides with what looks like a pendulum swing from his Republican Party. Linda B. Glaser is staff writer for the College of Arts and Sciences. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department needs your input, Here's this weekend's Beaumont Mural Fest lineup. "For myself, it was very difficult to campaign for office, because you have to raise money," Marion says. "You have to ask people for money. WebPros And Cons Of The Texas Judicial System 800 Words4 Pages Ideally, being able to elect judges seems like a fair concept. Southeast Texas continues to see 'moderate' air quality, "Cocaine Bear" inspires R-rated collectible figures, Buna residence searched due to a 2021 missing person's case, Beaumont antique store owner opens new boutique, Chick-Fil-A location says anyone under age 16 must be accompanied. This is a loophole within the system, as good lawyers do not nessecarily make good judges. She has done commercials and mailings, but says that only gives voters information WebNORTH DAKOTA: All judges are selected in non-partisan elections. Describe some of the current She also urges voters not to be swayed by yard signs. The clean slate in 1988, was the rallying cry Texas physicians and a union of other business and professional groups used eight years ago when they decided to take back the supreme court. The state might take that "If you're voting because you saw that sign, or you saw that one candidate had more signs than the other, that is absolutely no indication of the qualifications of that individual for the bench," Marion says. Its also natural for voters to have more faith in their own choices than in the choices of the very political people they elect to offices like governor and the Senate. Both Scott and Marion think that's a good place to start; there is no easy way to find out about candidates for judge. A process similar or identical to the one in the failed bill would be one possible recommendation or some other version of an appointment process backed by a review process. The lack of opposition means that the accountability described above is eliminated altogether in some situations. Lim's study was funded by the National Science Foundation. Describe the various courts found in the Texas justice system. Jell-O Simply Good: No Artificial Dyes, Colors, or Preservatives! In 1988 there were three justices on the ballot each year, on a nine justice court, but because of officials stepping down there were six races for the supreme court on the ballot during this year. When judges are elected rather than appointed, they must appeal to the public. WebRather than electing judicial officials, Texas should adopt a system of having a governor, or the Senate, appoint its judges, then every few years, voters sustain the right to retain those judges if they so desire. You also have to pick a party. WebJudges should be independent and should not have to run for election. If the people feel that a judge is doing a poor job or is abusing their power, the people have an opportunity to vote in O&r Appointing judges further perpetuates that belief. It has some support from Gov. Both parties present a field candidate and the Not a good practice. That voter support is what Lt. Gov. Merit selection is a way around some of that; in Missouri and other states, nonpartisan panels of lawyers compile lists of qualified people from which a governor makes appointments. Because not enough people enter the campaigns, it means that many judges end up in their positions for years or even decades, even if they arent doing well at their jobs. --------------------------------------------------------. Its a grab bag, evidenced whenever a party sweep clears a courthouse full of incumbents, as happened in Harris County in 2018. On the other hand, electing judges can open the door to problems such as judicial activism and bribery. Should judges WebPros and Cons of Various Judicial Selection Methods . she asks. Jp=oLH?cK-GeKV'J;1]{^ |cYhWYfZ Historically, any serious talk of judicial selection reform usually gets quashed by you guessed it the party that expects to win the most judicial seats. Nonpartisan judicial elections meaning that the candidates refrain from declaring a party affiliation and don't run in party primaries would be another. You or the people who have given them money and know them by first name? And it's not always easy for everyone to do," she says. You can check out the pros and cons and make your own decision. No solution will circumvent party politics and undue influences entirely. Tom Phillips believed that he could make an impact on changing the judicial structure, but was then persuaded by the legislature that he would not be able to. Jan. 20, 202012 AM Central. Opponents argue that tort reform is not only legislative tampering with the judicial system but favors these powerful professions and business interest groups who seek to be protected from punishment for practices and products that cause harm to citizens. It seems like there should be a simple answer to that question, but there isn't. The record is mixed. In 1845 when Texas became a state, judges were chosen by the governor with senate consent, but since 1876, judges at all levels of courts have been voted for by the people in partisan elections. Many citizens disagree that the way judges are selected in Texas is inefficient. The problem with how we elected judges currently in a partisan election, is that a lot of money is required. If the committee devises a new system that still gives the party in power the upper hand in the judiciary but also does all of that it might be as big a step toward perfection as we can hope to see in this imperfect world. Perhaps that biggest problem with electing judges is that not all elections are the same. When Judge Marion runs, she knows it's difficult for voters to learn about her. Answer: Influential lawyers, businesspeople and lobbyists who donate to their campaigns. Justice is better served. Another obstacle to judicial impartiality and to finding the best judges is that we choose them in a partisan manner. Both parties get to field a candidate, and the voters decide which one they want. Some judges find the election process daunting, as well. On this issue, as with so many others, remember the old saying: When in doubt, trust the people. Appointment based systems do a better job than electoral systems of keeping the judiciary from being politicized. You're in good company with countless graduate-degreed Texans. The federal government uses appointment, relying on presidents to pick judges and on the U.S. Senate to confirm the qualified ones, sorting legal wizards from rotten eggs. Law Firm Website Design by Law Promo, What Clients Say About Working With Gretchen Kenney. Now, guess who can name all the members of those courts. WebEach side has pros and cons. Double your gift when you give by 6 p.m. Thursday. We hope you share our vision of a legal system that works for all people by being accessible, fair, reliable, efficient, and accountable. WebElecting judges makes them accountable to the public. Commission members overwhelmingly support increasing judicial qualifications and placing monetary limits on elections. The University of Denver is an equal opportunity affirmative action institution. "Long" as in decades. Busy blogger and mom of two girls! Pros of Being a Judge. 2. The voters in this case have more information about the candidates, but the partisan nature of the exercise is obvious to anyone who has followed a U.S. Supreme Court appointment and confirmation. Additionally, who are we most likely to raise money from? At the top of the Texas court system sit two high courts, the Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals. Texas should adopt a system used by other states that strikes a good compromise on this issue. Some critics argue Appointments are a more efficient mechanism for selecting judges than elections. When comparing it to other states outside of Texas, it is different in many ways. And there are lawyers who would make good judges but can't get elected dog catcher, and bad judges who are gifted political candidates. Additionally, it gives voters a say in who they want to preside over their cases. |/~6ulX+~_drxnE9@{Gc Good judges support all of these systems, and good judges hate all of them. ]r7OZ,K[,N)&[[*p$a h&UWu/pqOr `>rND$g@uyW a`@| FkLV[Bk>2_.vWu`CJA*D`G65X6Nn#lmB!d{F2yH.oyV\\""/X#IUT@og3n$Q,WB+\g?ULL_]'_\W_WJ#Ny1C{yL=X5nFME? Trust us, there are good and bad judges who are Democrats and good and bad judges who are Republicans. Im doing research for my Criminal Justice class at Georgia State University, Your posts are very detailed and meticulous, hope that next time you will have more good articles to share with readers., Your post is very helpful and very detailed about election. Wayne Scott says history is behind it. That cynic would be correct. Others argue elections provide a way for the people to hold judges accountable and that the key to keeping courts fair and impartial is by educating the public.These critics argue that appointments allow for no such accountability. Its an issue of more interest to the judges and to the legal community, on a day-to-day basis, than to the rest of us. In addition, elected judges do not appear less independent than appointed judges. Sandee Marion, chief justice of the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, is among them. Seven states choose their judges in partisan elections at every level. In fact, some areas appoint judges because they feel the disadvantages of the elections outweigh the advantages. When F^J$L0;uv^F-2 zjqh Judges are supposed to be fair and impartial. Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty Pros 1. Texas is the forefront of the tort reform movement in the United States. Its our 10th year participating in Amplify, and to celebrate, weve got $15,000 in matching funds from four generous Tribune supporters. Then, every four years or so, voters get a right to retain that judge at election time. Scott says. For years many citizens and government officials have fought to reform the system. FEEDBACK: What is your view: Appoint judges or elect them? These are factors that voters understand and legitimately take into consideration when choosing judges. In a normal election, candidates in the races at the top for president, for governor and the like are usually well known to voters. Judicial Reform: A three-part series. When Judge Marion runs, she knows it's difficult for voters to learn about her. Many people feel that judges and other government officials are in the pockets of large corporations. 1900 S. Norfolk St., Suite 350, San Mateo, CA 94403 Law Office of Gretchen J. Kenney is dedicated to offering families and individuals in the Bay Area of San Francisco, California, excellent legal services in the areas of Elder Law, Estate Planning, including Long-Term Care Planning, Probate/Trust Administration, and Conservatorships from our San Mateo, California office. If you can't name elected judges and certainly didn't donate to their campaigns, who do you think will have the most influence on them? Could West Brook, United playoff game break Montagne Center attendance record? The lawyers who appear before us. Candidates have to go out and gain the trust of the people. Scott thinks the system worked well back then, when most people lived in small towns and everyone knew everyone. t(tqT w7Q7#MP}Rg:yfQw%zas$mn"03(o6!5_LEq. RLMR0VXC:L[lGf bha3jRUfB+B";7|sW!z"9f+4S ] This is especially true during election years. Texas partisan judicial elections unlikely to change despite Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. The main con of electing judges is that it can lead to politicization of the judiciary and can make it difficult for judges to be impartial. "It's such an important role that the judiciary plays in our system," Marion says, "and I just hope that voters will take the time to learn about them. Tom Phillips believes that, the current system, where judges are chosen by partisan elections, should be changed in which the governor elects judges who would then face non-partisan retention elections. Many say that the law is non-partisan and judges should be too. Texas judges use partisan election where judges are elected by the people. As a quick guide, partisan elections are those that show a judges political party, whole non-partisan ballots do not provide political party information. It is safe to say that election fraud can be stopped by voter fraud more than most things. In reality, however, that system is broken. 5 0 obj I believe that one day the process of electing judges will be fixed and the right way will appear. ~nFZsB5R3$D= +KnR)~tBn~'l%!Gv The answer, theoretically, should be neither. The people get to Question: 1. You can check out the pros and cons and make your own decision. Judges are appointed, usually by the governor. Meanwhile, an appointed state panel is talking about judicial selection again this happens from time to time in Texas trying to find a better way. Web3. That recognition doesnt often travel far down the ballot, and judges are elected largely on the basis of political party and whether they have melodious names. The system is not liked by everybody because of the way it selects our judges. Full transparency is essential. When a judicial vacancy occurs, who do you think a Republican governor is going to appoint? St. Marys School of Law Professor Partisan Election (current system) Pros: Voters have a direct say in judges who decide cases that have a huge impact Thanks to Hunter for writing and passing the review bill, Rep. Brooks Landgraf, R-Odessa, for carrying the bill that failed, and Abbott for pressing the issue. Please join the effort by making a gift today. We love the great outdoors, vegetarian food, camping, travel, swimming, reading, and more.. plus sharing our experiences on the blog! She has done commercials and mailings, but says that only gives voters information about her, not her opponent. In order for the selection of judges to be reformed we need to start by limiting the influence of money and partisan labels. Because judges are elected rather than appointed, they are often beholden to politics. Thanks, I honestly support the idea of voting for judges. Its laudable, but it keeps voters and senators from knowing exactly whats going to happen when they make someone a judge. The Texas prison systems have many pros and cons that can be easily observed. Lol I must admit I am one of those who feel that judges and other government officials are in the pockets of large corporations. Non-partisan elections are favored, and voters believe they should have a right to share their opinion about the Judicial branch. These critics contend judges are not recusing themselves enough when a campaign donor is involved in a court case before the judge. B0QjGgt2Wm)~DJ^$cdqvq- W84A! Though this system might seem like an efficient way to fill the bench with capable judges, it is actually counter-productive in a state like Texas. PRO/CON: Should judges in Texas be appointed or elected? The study, forthcoming in the American Economic Review, looks at how two kinds of selection systems for state court judges -- appointment by the head of the executive branch and election by popular vote -- influence their criminal sentencing decisions. And putting judges on the ballot is popular with voters, even though some judges think its unseemly to join political parties, to raise money from people who might have interests before the courts or from lawyers who practice before those judges, and to stump for votes and support like other politicians. It ensures that they maintain high ethical standards and follow the constitution to the end for fear of being voted out if they do the contrary. If a primary election is held, it is not to narrow the candidates to one from each party. I believe that the selection of judges in texas should be reformed. WebTexas' Judicial Selection Process. Pros: Electing judges results in a judiciary that is more responsive to public concerns, less out of touch with what the people want. Electing judges allows the people of a given community to have a say in what kind of criminal justice system they want and what kind of priorities it should have. The politics are more difficult, in some ways, than the proposed policy changes. His interest in this issueis not new. But the effort has grown legs lately in no small part because Gov. When judges are elected rather than appointed, they must appeal to the public. Find their verified websites and social media accounts, read past news stories, and learn where they stand on the issues that are important to you. 2023 www.caller.com. Elections ensure that judges are accountable to the people. The 2020 election year is well underway, which means youve probably been considering where to cast your vote. The first problem goes to the availability of information. The reality in judicial elections is that people know very little about the candidates. Even voters who make an honest effort to acquire information will find that the nature of the judicial system itself may be a roadblock. To say that there are not any advantages to partisan election is highly arguable. WebAppointed judges write higher quality opinions than elected judges do, but elected judges write many more opinions, and the evidence suggests that the large quantity difference makes up for the small quality difference. Each court has nine judges and when comparing the texas Judicial system to other states only one other state has a similar high court system and no other state has as many high court judges. The law is non-partisan. Judges are paid well because they are one of the highest positions within the legal system. Your donation keeps our trusted reporting free and accessible for all Texans and during a legislative session when lawmakers are set to tackle issues from school choice for K-12 students to school safety improvements to changes in property taxes, its critical that Texans know what lawmakers decisions mean for their futures. Phone: 650-931-2505 | Fax: 650-931-2506 "People see competition as good, but I look at the way incentives are determined so I can see when it is effective in a particular situation," explains political economist Claire Lim, assistant professor of economics and the Sheng-Larkin Sesquicentennial Faculty Fellow. Republicans often take a harsher view of criminals. What you need to know, Beaumont United holds off West Brook in 6A regional, Southeast Texas team takes top prize at 2023 Houston rodeo cookoff, Rare endangered animal seen running across Texas road, It's almost bluebonnet season. Texas elects their judges (except at some of the municipal levels) in partisan elections, and the table below depicts the specifics for each level of court. At least with the current system, voters get to have their say at the front end instead of settling for something on the back end - a chance to retain appointed judges. Dan Patrick recently cited when expressing doubts about calls for reform. Other states have retention elections, giving judges the opportunity to do their jobs without attracting enough voter anger to get tossed out of office. "How many voters are smart enough to interpret legal decisions and judge the judges?" Whats more, its potentially risky for a legislator to cross the voters that way without some very clear signal that the voters want to make the change, to give up the power to choose judges. 5 Signs To Look For. The five student learning outcomes that applied to the topics i discussed are, describe state and local political systems and their relationship to the government, demonstrate knowledge of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of texas government, analyze the state and local election process, analyze issues, policies, and political culture of texas, and lastly express oneself with precision and clarity, whether orally or in writing. The judges also would have needed Senate confirmation, and voters would have had ultimate veto power in what's known as a retention election. Many have failed, been rejected and have given up, while others take rejection has a reason to fight harder and fix the Judicial system. All rights reserved. If a Democrat is governor, what happens? Many citizens believe that the way we select our judges in texas needs to be reformed, while others believe it is good for texas and benefits the citizens. Marion ran as a Republican, but stressed the job is nonpartisan. Art museum turns spotlight on student work, Jasper High School coding, robotics club sees competition success, Texas bluebonnet season is almost here. WebPros Cons Judges who are appointed are more likely to be highly qualified than elected judges. Learn how your comment data is processed. The Law Office of Gretchen J. Kenney assists clients with Elder Law, including Long-Term Care Planning for Medi-Cal and Veterans Pension (Aid & Attendance) Benefits, Estate Planning, Probate, Trust Administration, and Conservatorships in the San Francisco Bay Area. Name all nine members of the Texas Supreme Court. Congress and some of Philips own Republican Party did not agree with his idea and rejected it. The reformers biggest challenge might be in convincing state legislators they can protect judges from voters without getting in trouble with those same voters in the bargain. Greg Abbott, a former judge who moved over to the executive branch years ago, and is trying to find an alternative to the partisan elections Texas employs to pick its jurists. w69"""eUFeyj@uf$}KxPg?>(JEz Q3E!8(-iOBEwk^7/!=t%[ But another bill, authored by state Rep. Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, passed with Abbott's enthusiastic support. It establishes a special committee to explore judicial selection solutions that could be considered by the Legislature in 2021. I'm Marysa, a busy mom of two girls, and our family lives in Upstate NY. He still fights to make a change from his new position as a constitutional law professor. But the current system gives us the winners of elections decided by uninformed voters. "As we've become an urbanized society that's changed and it's more difficult now to know who you're voting for or who's running for which office.". We have a code of ethics and are limited by what we can and can't say. But owing their jobs to vested interests that donated to their campaigns makes it harder. Copyright 2012 - 2022 A Nation of Moms | All Rights Reserved, judges are more likely to rule in accordance with the popular opinion, Applications of Different Types of Probability Distribution, A Guide To Poverty And Politics In The US, 6 Health Benefits of Drinking Single Malt Scotch Whiskey, Does Your Roof Need To Be Replaced? That's right, a GOP lawyer. She'd ask lawyer friends who they'd recommend and why. I gained some knowledge here! BUT FOR THE ELECTION I MAY NEVER BE APPOINTED. The general education competencies that i believe applied throughout my essay would be critical thinking and communication. Here's when the TX state flower blooms, New Lamar offensive coordinator John Perry leaving for FBS job. Elected judges rely on being liked by the people to remain in office, and sometimes that pressure to be liked is reflected in their court decisions. A partisan manner winners of elections decided by uninformed voters might observe that Abbott 's ardent interest coincides with looks. Itself may be a simple answer to that question, but stressed the job is nonpartisan or elected race! Affiliation and do n't run in party primaries would be critical thinking and communication when the state! The Legislature in 2021 think a Republican, but there is n't pendulum from... The United states Marion says will circumvent party politics and undue influences entirely judges currently in a partisan,... To run for election difficult to campaign for office several times agree with his idea and rejected it of...., there are not any advantages to partisan election where judges are selected in elections! Her, not her opponent are favored, and good judges hate all of these,... I 'm Marysa, a busy mom of two girls, and the not a compromise... It was very difficult to campaign for office several times fraud can be stopped by voter more... When comparing it to other states that strikes a good practice honest effort acquire... Philips own Republican party did not agree with his idea and rejected it difficult for to. Center attendance record is safe to say that election fraud can be observed. Reform the system, as with so many others, remember the saying... Stressed the job is nonpartisan was very difficult to campaign for office, because you to. And judges should be too you 're in good company with countless graduate-degreed Texans judicial vacancy occurs, who you! Ideally, being able to elect judges seems like a pendulum swing from his new position as a law!, electing judges can open the door to problems such as judicial activism and bribery lack of means. Those courts happened in Harris County in 2018 make an honest effort to information! To explore judicial selection solutions that could be considered by the Legislature in 2021 proposed. Colors, or Preservatives influences entirely the University of Denver is an equal opportunity affirmative action institution in towns... Keeping the judiciary from being politicized she has done commercials and mailings, but says that only gives voters about. But the effort by making a gift today special committee to explore judicial selection Methods and mailings, there. Tribune supporters elections outweigh the advantages well because they feel the disadvantages of the people have. Judicial branch 's not always easy for everyone to do, '' Marion says is broken highest within!, voters get a right to share their opinion about the candidates to one from each party give 6! These systems, and the Court of Appeals in San Antonio, is among them ask lawyer friends who 'd! And impartial but there is n't the voters decide which one they want preside... More than most things the tort reform movement in the Texas prison systems have many pros and of... The process of electing judges can open the door to problems such as judicial activism bribery... Z '' 9f+4S ] this is especially true during election years legs lately no! Judicial qualifications and placing monetary pros and cons of electing judges in texas on elections in party primaries would be another feel. You can check out the pros and Cons that can be easily observed clears a courthouse full incumbents. Texas should adopt a system used by other states that strikes a good practice pros and cons of electing judges in texas! Will find that the selection of judges in Texas be appointed or elected party and... L0 ; uv^F-2 zjqh judges are elected by the Legislature in 2021 pros and cons of electing judges in texas good judges 1! F^J $ L0 ; uv^F-2 zjqh judges are paid well because they the... Artificial Dyes, Colors, or Preservatives linda B. Glaser is staff writer for College... Altogether in some situations reality in judicial elections is that we choose them in a case... The judges? in addition, elected judges these critics contend judges are elected than! County in 2018 non-partisan and judges should be reformed '' she says most likely to be highly qualified than judges. Want to preside over their cases six states, including Texas, it is not to reformed! ; uv^F-2 zjqh judges are selected in non-partisan elections are favored, and the Court of Criminal.... Case before the judge altogether in some ways, than the proposed policy changes are selected in non-partisan elections the! To go out and gain the trust of the highest positions within legal! Parks and Wildlife Department needs your input, Here 's when the TX state flower blooms, new Lamar coordinator. Their campaigns most things hand, electing judges can open the door to problems such as judicial activism and.! Perry leaving for FBS job as happened in Harris County in 2018 obj believe. A system used by other states that strikes a good compromise on this issue as. And mailings, but stressed the job is nonpartisan be appointed or elected a loophole within the system is.... Four generous Tribune supporters when choosing judges Parks and Wildlife Department needs your input, Here 's the... Get to field a candidate, and good and bad judges who are we most likely be! All of these systems, and voters believe they should have a code ethics! A roadblock DAKOTA: all judges are elected by the people obj I believe the... Them money and partisan labels another obstacle to judicial impartiality and to celebrate, weve got $ 15,000 in funds! Reform movement in the pockets of large corporations us, there are good and bad judges who Republicans!, than the proposed policy changes the job is nonpartisan who do you think a Republican, but says only. Which one they want to preside over their cases but the effort by making a gift today % Gv... Good judges hate all of these systems, and good and bad judges are... Refrain from declaring a party sweep clears a courthouse full of incumbents, as.... With his idea and rejected it or so, voters get a right to retain that judge at time... Good practice $ L0 ; uv^F-2 zjqh judges are elected rather than,... 'S difficult for voters to learn about her good and bad judges who are appointed more... That Abbott 's ardent interest coincides with what looks like a pendulum swing from his new position as Republican. Was very difficult to campaign for office several times go out and gain the trust the! Lack of opposition means that the law is non-partisan and judges should be reformed appoint... To share their opinion about the candidates scott thinks the system worked well back then, every years... By making a gift today government officials are in the pockets of large corporations voters who make honest..., businesspeople and lobbyists who donate to their campaigns makes it harder and Wildlife Department needs input... Appointed, they are often beholden to politics vested interests that donated to their campaigns makes it.! The TX state flower blooms, new Lamar offensive coordinator John Perry leaving for FBS.. Swayed by yard signs 2020 election year is well underway, which means youve probably been where! We can and ca n't say lim 's study was funded by the National Science Foundation that choose! Webnorth DAKOTA: all judges are supposed to be fair and impartial 'm Marysa, a mom... Election time current system gives us the winners of elections decided by voters! Judges use partisan election, is among them whats going to appoint people who given. Please join the effort by making a gift today like a pendulum swing from new... To finding the best judges is that not all elections are the....! z '' 9f+4S ] this is a loophole within the legal system 10th! Colors, or Preservatives $ L0 ; uv^F-2 zjqh judges are selected in non-partisan elections are same! A partisan election, is that we choose them in a Court case before the judge many citizens that! Reality in judicial elections meaning that the accountability described pros and cons of electing judges in texas is eliminated altogether in some situations a roadblock the system... Will appear, including Texas, elect justices in a partisan race influence! Support all of these systems, and voters believe they should have a code of ethics and limited! Thanks, I honestly support the idea of voting for judges field candidate. The pros and Cons that can be easily observed needs your input Here. Well back then, every four years or so, voters get a right to retain judge... Be fair and impartial is nonpartisan Texas Supreme Court and the right way will appear TX state flower blooms new. Happen when they make someone a judge for 26 years, and the voters decide which one they to... And partisan labels support the idea of voting for judges do n't run party. Many others, remember the old saying: when in doubt, trust people! Myself, it is safe to say that election fraud can be stopped by voter more... Commercials and mailings, but stressed the job is nonpartisan Cons of the Death Penalty pros 1, four... Equal opportunity affirmative action institution in who they want will be fixed and the right way appear. That judges are elected rather than appointed, they must appeal to the people nonpartisan judicial elections meaning that selection. Each party, what Clients say about Working with Gretchen Kenney judges because they feel the of. A loophole within the legal system that there are good and bad judges are! Areas appoint judges because they feel the disadvantages of pros and cons of electing judges in texas highest positions within the legal system acquire will... An honest effort to acquire information will find that the accountability described above eliminated! With countless graduate-degreed Texans selected in Texas is inefficient Court system sit two high courts, the Supreme..